docs: tighten the README prose - #61
Conversation
Greptile SummaryThis documentation-only PR replaces several playful or verbose README passages with shorter, more direct explanations.
Confidence Score: 4/5The PR appears safe to merge, with only a non-blocking request to restore the README’s established source-line wrapping. The shortened prose remains technically accurate; the only accepted concern is reduced Markdown source readability from six newly collapsed long lines. Files Needing Attention: README.md Important Files Changed
Prompt To Fix All With AI### Issue 1
README.md:113
**Long Markdown Lines**
The tightened paragraphs are now long physical lines, unlike the README’s consistent 70–80-character wrapping. This makes the Markdown source and future diffs harder to read. Please reflow this paragraph and the other newly collapsed paragraphs at lines 121, 134, 141, 170, and 176 while keeping the revised prose.
---
For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs: tighten the README prose" | Re-trigger Greptile |
| Stop that process before the deadline and restart it afterwards. The reminder | ||
| is still in the Rails database and runs when the process returns. We have given | ||
| `self.available += 1` a supervisor and excellent posture. | ||
| is still in the Rails database and runs when the process returns. The reminder survived the restart. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The tightened paragraphs are now long physical lines, unlike the README’s consistent 70–80-character wrapping. This makes the Markdown source and future diffs harder to read. Please reflow this paragraph and the other newly collapsed paragraphs at lines 121, 134, 141, 170, and 176 while keeping the revised prose.
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: README.md
Line: 113
Comment:
**Long Markdown Lines**
The tightened paragraphs are now long physical lines, unlike the README’s consistent 70–80-character wrapping. This makes the Markdown source and future diffs harder to read. Please reflow this paragraph and the other newly collapsed paragraphs at lines 121, 134, 141, 170, and 176 while keeping the revised prose.
---
For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
No description provided.